Telegraph failed to separate fact from opinion in cycle path coverage, rules press watchdog
The Daily Telegraph in Sydney breached the Australian Press Council’s principles on separating fact and opinion in its campaigning coverage of Sydney’s cycle paths.
The APC ruledin relation to 17 articles relating to Sydney Mayor Clover Moore, who is also a state MP. The coverage focused on the bike lanes and also on her dual political roles.
The complainant said the newspaper had provided unfair and unbalanced coverage of both issues.
The newspaper argued that it was entitled to campaign on both topics.
The APC ruled:
“The Press Council emphasises that publications are entitled to express strong opinions on issues and to use their editorials and opinion spaces for that purpose. This advocacy can be so vigorous and sustained as to constitute a campaign, provided that it complies with the Council’s principles which, for example, require fact and opinion to be clearly separated and headlines to fairly reflect the tenor of the accompanying article.
“The Council has concluded that the headlines mentioned above breached these principles because they expressed the newspaper’s opinions rather than being a summary of facts reported in the accompanying news story. The inclusion in a news story of words such as “crazy council policies”, “junket” and “diva-like list of demands” which were not attributed to any sources also failed to separate fact from opinion. Accordingly, the complaint is upheld on these grounds.”
However, the APC also ruled: “The Council does not consider that the newspaper’s overall coverage has been sufficiently unfair and unbalanced as to constitute a breach of the Council’s principles and, therefore, this aspect of the complaint is not upheld.”
When Tele editor Paul Whittaker discussed the newspaper with Mumbrella editor Tim Burrowes a few weeks ago, he was robust in his defence of the newspaper’s campaigning style, arguing that CBD did not stand for “Central Bike Riding District”:
The APC is a voluntary body funded by the press itself. Other than publishing the ruling, The Tele will face no further punishment.
Late last year,the APC ruled that the Tele had similarly breached its principlesin its campaigning coverage of the National Broadband Network. Yesterday The Tele published an APC ruling thatThe Tele’s headlines did not separate fact from opinion in its coverage of asylum seekers. A fortnight ago sister titlethe Sunday Telegraph was found to have invaded the privacy of former Labor leader Mark Latham’s children.
The articles:
- May 12th 2011,When it comes to car parking, Clover gets more as you get less,
- June 5th 2011,Can’t do two jobs: Mayors,
- June 6th 2011,One big hat is more than enough for Clover Moore, Barry O’Farrell says,
- June 7th 2011,Less truly is Moore – Campaign for super mayor to represent all of Sydney,
- June 11th 2011,This is trench warfare, Clover,
- June 12th 2011,Moore’s sailing back to a storm,
- June18th 2011,Tackling double-dip MPs – Barry O’Farrell out to roll Clover Moore,
- June 19th 2011,Moore’s in Clover at Fairfax,
- June 20th 2011,Moore cycleway madness in CBD thanks to Lord Mayor Clover Moore,
- June 26th 2011,Sydney mayor Clover Moore snubs Canberra,
- June 29th 2011,Business leaders demand say in running Sydney,
- 2011年6月30日,Clover Moore’s council policies are sending businesses away from the CBD,
- October 31st 2011,Bike-loving City of Sydney councillors get free perks and a $6000 tab to be chauffered,
- 27th November 2011,Clover will double dip no more at next year’s council elections,
- 17th December 2011,Lord Mayor Clover Moore doesn’t give two hoots about clash of two hats
- 23rd December 2011,Clover Moore wanted feedback on her bike paths disaster – we can tell her now: TEAR THEM UP
- 1st January 2012,Clover Moore told to stay on as Sydney Lord Mayor, downplays role change
Yesterday the Tele published a ruling that it had breached the APC’s principles in its reporting of refugees.
what is the point of these rulings if there’s no punishment associated?
User ID not verified.
Oh enough already. The Telegraph or any paper for that matter is a privately produced product which is optional to buy. If they defame you, you can sue them.
If you don’t like what they say, tough. Or start your own paper.
The trouble with the Clover Moores of this world is that they perceive private property as public infrastructure, with all the obligations that implies. It’s an old 1970’s neo-socialist viewpoint, rather like complaining to the Politburo about articles in Pravda.
So Clover here’s the late-breaking news: you live in a modern democracy where newspapers can say anything they damned well like so long as they don’t defame anybody.
别自以为是。
User ID not verified.
If the Tele put as much effort into promoting the cycle paths as they do bashing them they might find fewer opportunities to photograph empty cycle paths. I was personally disgusted by the counter productive coverage – all over the world cities are trying to be proactive about reducing congestion and helping the environment and Sydney’s major publication decided to respond to progress by getting in the way of it.
User ID not verified.
Oh look, another gumming from the Toothless Tiger.
User ID not verified.